AI Adoption in Legal Marketing: What Actually Works

Rolling out AI to support business development (BD) is less about the technology and more about how you lead the change. This is the story of how we did it at Bracewell: the decisions we made, the roles we assigned, and what we learned while implementing a BD-focused AI tool with our partners. Every firm is different, but many of the lessons we learned apply to any firm size trying to drive adoption of a new technology.

When we introduced a BD-focused AI tool to our partners, the technology itself was fairly straightforward. The platform helps partners identify opportunities to connect with clients and draft personalized outreach based on the firm's insights and experience.

The harder part was driving adoption. Success depended less on the tool and more on ownership, support, training, and helping partners see how it could make something they were already doing easier and more effective.

Unlike general AI tools, BD-focused AI platforms are built specifically for business development. They help partners uncover opportunities, strengthen relationships, and stay engaged with clients in a timely and relevant way. The challenge is not the technology itself. It's helping busy professionals incorporate a new approach into the way they already build and maintain client relationships.

If there's one thing we learned, it's that rolling out a BD-focused AI tool is as much a change management exercise as it is a technology project. Here are a few lessons from our experience that may help other firms.

Lead With the Business Problem, Not the Technology

One of the biggest mistakes firms make is starting with the technology instead of the business problem. We focused first on what we were trying to solve and then evaluated whether the tool could help us get there. Partners don't adopt technology because it's new. They adopt it when it helps them do their jobs better.

At Bracewell, the starting point was not AI. Our BD and marketing teams were investing significant time pulling together client context: relationship history, recent activity, and potential touchpoints. At the same time, partners were receiving information from multiple sources but did not always have a clear path from that information to action. The intelligence was there. The connection to timely, relevant outreach was not.

Framing it that way changed the entire conversation with partners. They were not being asked to adopt new technology. They were being offered a better way to do something they were already trying to do.

The takeaway: If you cannot articulate the BD problem the tool solves in a single sentence that partners immediately recognize as their own, the rollout will struggle no matter how strong the technology. Start with the problem, and everything else becomes easier.

Make It a Leadership Initiative, Not a Technology Project

Clear ownership was critical to the success of our rollout. We relied on three key roles: An executive sponsor or chief to champion the initiative; a BD leader who could connect the tool to the way attorneys work; and a program owner responsible for strategy, implementation, training, and adoption. We also made a deliberate effort to position it as a BD initiative rather than a technology project. That distinction made a difference in how partners viewed the effort and their willingness to engage with it.

We did not position this as an IT deployment. We positioned it as a firm initiative to improve how partners engage with clients, and we structured the leadership accordingly. Three roles drove the rollout, each bringing something the others could not.

Our chief marketing and business development officer (CMBDO) set the strategic frame. This was not positioned as an experiment. It was introduced as part of how the firm approaches client development, connected explicitly to the firm's BD priorities. Partners receive it differently when it is tied to firm strategy. It carries weight that a technology demo does not. Sustained reinforcement from our CMBDO throughout the rollout kept that momentum going well past launch.

Our BD director, working closely with our CMBDO, served as the bridge between the tool and how attorneys actually work. That meant identifying the right partners and client groupings for the pilot, coaching attorneys on putting the outputs to work in real client scenarios, and making sure what the tool produced reflected how the firm develops relationships. In our experience, this is also where most BD AI initiatives fall apart. The tool gets deployed, training happens, and then the marketing operations team steps back. Attorneys need someone who understands their BD instincts to help them see where the tool fits. That is a BD leadership function, not a technology one.

My role centered on owning the MarTech and BD technology AI strategy for the firm: how we would identify the right tools, build the case for them, roll them out, and ensure partners adopted them. That meant evaluating and selecting the platform, leading configuration and integration, designing the rollout model, and serving as the primary liaison between firm leadership, BD, and our external vendor. I also owned all firm-wide messaging from marketing leadership to partners and users, ensuring communication was consistent and strategic at every phase. Usage metrics lived with me as well, keeping us close to how partners were engaging with the tool and where adjustments were needed. Data maintenance was managed by my team, keeping the platform accurate, current, and reliable as the program scaled.

Owning the strategy meant staying accountable well past launch. Implementation has a finish line. Adoption does not. I built the training program, created the onboarding materials, ran one-on-one and small group sessions, and continuously refined the experience based on what partners were actually doing with the tool.

The takeaway: Before you launch, be clear about who will champion the program and drive adoption over the long term. If a key role is missing, address it before you launch.

Be Deliberate About Where and How You Start

For the pilot, we looked for attorneys who were engaged, willing to try something new, and comfortable providing honest feedback. Getting the tool in their hands early helped us identify issues, refine our approach, and build credibility before expanding to a broader audience.

We made an intentional decision not to launch firmwide. We started with a pilot group of 13 partners within an existing client development program where engagement was already strong and client priorities were clearly defined. Starting there meant partners did not have to find a reason to use the tool. They were using it to support existing relationships and client development work. That distinction made adoption feel natural rather than forced.

Who we included mattered just as much as where we started. We were not looking for the most tech-savvy partners. We were looking for partners who were actively engaged in BD, genuinely curious, and willing to tell us what was and was not working. Those qualities turned out to be far better predictors of a successful pilot than technical comfort.

We also pushed to get the tool in front of lawyers earlier than felt comfortable. There is always a temptation to over-refine internally before exposing something to partners. We resisted it. Partners surfaced issues and opportunities that no amount of internal testing would have revealed. Their feedback, grounded in real client work, was the most valuable signal we had.

Starting small gave us credibility, real-world insight, and momentum. It also created something we had not fully anticipated: demand. Other partners started asking to be included.

The takeaway: Don't wait until everything feels finished. Some of the most valuable lessons come from putting the tool in front of users and learning from how they actually use it.

Design for Behavior Change and Build Feedback In

Technology alone doesn't change behavior. We spent as much time on training, communication, and setting expectations as we did on the platform itself. Training was built around actual business development activities, not generic examples, and we adjusted our approach based on partner feedback and real-world usage rather than waiting for a formal review cycle.

We approached this as a behavior change program, not a deployment. Training was built around real use cases rather than platform demos. We ran one-on-one and small group sessions, held ongoing office hours, and built feedback loops that ran throughout the pilot.

From day one, we set clear guardrails: AI outputs were a starting point, not a finished product. Partners stayed in control of every client interaction. Positioning it that way helped build trust quickly and made adoption feel like a natural extension of how they already worked, not a risk they were being asked to take.

We also did not wait for a formal review cycle to act on what we were hearing. We refined the tool in real time based on what partners were actually doing with it. Partners saw their input shaping the product directly, which made them more willing to engage honestly and invest in making it work.

The impact we saw was behavioral. Partners became more consistent in their client outreach. The connection between client intelligence and firm capabilities became clearer. Within our pilot group of 13, we also saw something we had not explicitly designed for: partners began sharing insights with colleagues who had relationships with the same clients, opening up natural cross-selling conversations that might otherwise have been missed.

As partners experienced reliable, relevant outputs from the tool, their openness deepened. They began adding clients to the program themselves, confident the tool would help them show up at the right moment.

The takeaway: The goal isn't simply to generate more activity. It's to help partners engage with the right clients at the right time and do it more consistently.

A Few Lessons From Our Experience

In my experience, BD technology rollouts work best when MarTech and BD leadership own it. When it sits primarily with IT, the connection to how partners develop business can get lost. When marketing and BD leadership own the rollout, the framing, the training, and the accountability, the conversation changes entirely.

Define clear ownership before you start. Begin where partner engagement already exists. Get the tool in front of lawyers earlier than feels ready. And stay close to adoption long after launch day because that is where the real work happens.

Partners need to see AI as something that elevates their instincts and expertise, not something that replaces them. That framing is what separates the firms seeing lasting value from the ones still waiting for adoption to happen on its own.

For legal marketing leaders, that is an opportunity to lead from the front, shape what BD and MarTech strategy looks like in your firm, and create lasting impact.

Learn More About Marketing Management and Leadership With the Third Edition of the LMA Body of Knowledge The content in this feature correlates with the Marketing Management and Leadership  domain in the LMA Body of Knowledge (BoK). Dive deeper and access the latest edition of the BoK online. The Third Edition of the LMA BoK showcases enhanced expertise across every domain, introduces new competencies in Client Services, Communications and Technology Management, features more advanced skills across all domains and broadens coverage of competitive and business intelligence skills. Plus, it emphasizes a stronger commitment to nurturing diversity, equity, and inclusion across the entirety of the BoK. Learn more.